It is interesting to watch the Left’s tantrum on Trump’s defunding the NEA at the same time they clamor to support the unlimited expansion of an ideology more destructive to the Arts than any Western leader has been, ever.
As we move into an AI-based post-Industrial world dragging the Industrial world behind us, how is it advisable not to eradicate a pre-Industrial tribal world that, for most in the protected establishment is a museum exhibit (aren’t those clothes and praying techniques just precious?) and, for the remaining billions of us, insistent on killing all those more advanced than they?
The depredations against not only the Arts, but against human rights, and the economic destruction this ideology brings to every nation and continent are harming progress for all: in living standards, medicine, morals, safety, government spending (on security rather than useful endeavors), fertility (ppl w heads hacked off don’t reproduce), as well as all advances in the Arts & Sciences are immeasurable and must be stopped permanently
To continue the progress the West has led in the Arts & Science since Classical Greece, the progress we have led in living standards since the Industrial Revolution and that has advanced the entire world, at a minimum islam must forcibly be put back into its box. Preferably, since if not killed the ideology will again raise its premodern head to damage future generations, it must be eradicated permanently.
How? Destroy its centers of ideology & funding quickly & inexpensively with one small tactical nuclear weapon on each of Mecca, Medina, Qom, Quetta and Fordo. Then remove all remaining women of childbearing age (China is down tens of millions of women in this age cohort), essentially breeding off the planet an ideology that is destructive to the combined futures of 6 billion people – and ALL of our descendants.
It’s nice to be nice. But when the future, progress & our kids & Civilization are at stake, harsher measures are required.
If you disagree but are unable to provide a PlanB, your disagreement is based on emotion rather than fact.
How much more regression do we accept before doing what needs to be done?