The grabbers demand “common sense” gun restrictions. According to whom? “Common sense” says that I get to defend my family, that my kids are more important than the life of any attacker. That NO bad guy is more important than my family.
Anyone thinking Democrats care enough about families & children to want them protected hasn’t been paying attention to the destruction of families & futures by Democrat policy on education (unions destroying minds) moms murdering their own kids (‘not her fault’), welfare destroying families, Obama destroying jobs, and the Planned Parenthood ‘Parts is Parts’ campaign.
The grabbers say Americans support controlling guns – but refuse to test their theory with a constitutional amendment they know would never be ratified by the required 3/4 of the States.
The grabbers say we need more laws – but reject enforcing the ones we have because liberals reject the idea that actions have consequences.
The grabbers say restricting guns will reduce crime – when the facts prove the opposite in every time, culture and country.
Why do Dems support an increase in violent crime? Why do women vote for the More-Crime Party that’ll get more of their kids killed?
The grabbers say the 2nd was written when all guns were single-shot muzzle loaders so that’s all it applies to. In history, the Second ensured civilians had access to the same weapon technology (all that existed, as Dems note) as the army; are Democrats supporting civilian access to today’s crew-served weapons? Even the NRA isn’t asking that. Technological advances inform both sides of that argument – but Dems are unable to grasp this simple fact. (Full disclosure: I’m a Life Member and a competition shooter.)
The grabbers insist 2A is about hunting, when all contemporaneous literature shows 2A was to restrain our own government if necessary. (Libs say they are smarter but evidently can’t read.)
The grabbers demand that the first ten amendments are the Bill of Permissions, but say they support the Constitution, though by their actions prove they reject the Rule of Law.
The grabbers say the cops can be relied on to protect us – when SCOTUS twice has held cops have no duty to do so.
The grabbers (& Christie) reject hollow point bullets, evidently hoping the bullet killing the violent criminal will over-penetrate & kill the kid in the next room or the mom down the street… insisting more dangerous bullets are less dangerous. (Which Party is anti-science?)
Gun control has never been about guns. It’s always been about control.
In America, WE control the government – not the other way ’round.
… and the Left can’t STAND that